Welcome to Sethdot Technology Linux Business News Security Games
 faq
 code
 awards
 journals
 older stuff
 preferences
 submit story
 supporters
 topics
 about

Ask Sethdot: Best Linux for a large department
Ask Sethdot Posted by Seth on Thursday December 20, @06:59AM
from the ask-a-stupid-question dept.
qluless asks: "I have just started a new job at a company with about a hundred desktop UNIX clients. The problem is, however, that we are running every UNIX flavor that there is under the sun -- Solaris, IRIX, Tru64, and a few distributions of Linux. This is really a support nightmare, but thankfully the company just received a big grant to replace all machines with nice Athlon boxes. I have decided that for the sake of my time we are going to install one Linux distribution on all machines, so I am currently deciding which distribution would be the best solution for this problem. I hear really good things about Slackware's stability and ease of administration, so that is currently my number one choice. Anyone can give me any pointers?"
Ask Sethdot: Best Linux for a large department
Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are the stupid ideas of whoever posted them. We do not agree with them in any way.
Are you on crack? (Score:0, Flamebait)
by Seth on Monday December 20, @06:11AM

what the hell is wrong with you? slackware is a complete disaster when it comes to systems administration:

no binary packaging system
ass-poor installer
bsd-style init scripts???

I'd like to see you administering a hundred slackware boxes. In fact, we could all do with a laugh.

-sv

Re: Are you on crack? (Score:-2, Informative)
by slakdude on Monday December 20, @06:15AM
> no binary packaging system

That is just wrong. If you actually bothered to check your facts, you would know that Slackware has a very sensible BSD-ish packaging system. Instead of using some ass-backwards format like RPM, it packages the contents in a tar'd and gz'd file, adding an installation script. You can add a package by running pkg_add pkg.tgz, and removing a package is done by running pkg_delete pkg. Get your facts straight.

--
Registered Slackware user #6.

Re: Are you on crack? (Score:0, Flamebait)
by Seth on Monday December 20, @06:13AM
> You can add a package by running pkg_add pkg.tgz and removing a package
> is done by running pkg_delete pkg.

I'm sorry, but I don't consider anything that doesn't have something as basic as dependency checking a packaging system. anything that would allow you to pkg_delete a package WITHOUT FIRST MAKING SURE THAT IT WON'T BREAK HALF THE WORLD has only one place on my system, and that is /dev/null.

-sv

Why x86? That is so lame! (Score:-1, Flamebait)
by sungod on Monday December 20, @06:22AM
Why Athlons? You would need an extra A/C unit in each office just to keep the heat down. And linux? Oh, please! I suggest you go with a set of nice sparc stations running Solaris 8 -- at least it's still going to be around one year later.

--
Linux is obsolete -- (A. Tenenbaum, 1992).

Re: Why x86? That is so lame! (Score:0, Flamebait)
by Seth on Monday December 20, @06:19AM

maybe because he needs to buy a 100 desktops and not 15 -- I believe that would be about the same amount, no?

> And linux? Oh, please! I suggest you go with a set of nice sparc
> stations running Solaris 8 -- at least it's still going to be around
> one year later.

have you ever tried administering Solaris on a large scale? wait, let me guess, no. oh, and good luck waiting for the patches from sun while your boxes get cracked left and right after each new sploit.

-sv

Try SuSE (Score:-3, Interesting)
by adolph22 on Monday December 20, @06:30AM

SuSE is used nearly everywhere in Europe. It's a nice KDE-centered system that is RPM-based, features a convenient administration system called "yast", and has been proven to be very stable.

--
Meine lighten auf deblinken und haagen das.

Re: Try SuSE (Score:0, Flamebait)
by Seth on Monday December 20, @06:281AM

KDE is butt-ugly and yast is a disaster area -- have you checked its license? if you did, you'd know that it's a closed-source proprietary system which has no place on a GPL system such as linux.

oh, and SuSE has been known to ship broken releases.

-sv

FreeBSD, baby. (Score:0, Troll)
by bsdune8 on Monday December 20, @06:42AM

Forget linux. FreeBSD or bust!

--
We have USB support now, too!

Re: FreeBSD, baby. (Score:0, Flamebait)
by Seth on Monday December 20, @06:41AM

*** Sethdot system message: User account bsdune8 deleted ***

ooops, did I do that? ;)

-sv